United States government should release more UFO information to the public

Introduction Nearly a decade ago, the collocation â€Å"X-files† became popular. Due to the plot of a famous film, X-files are now associated with the information about the UFO, which is accessible exclusively for a tight circle of professionals (Lazerri, 1). So is the information about UFOs still secret and who decides whether the public is allowed to know it? Nowadays these questions bother every American, as people are willing to know the truth.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on United States government should release more UFO information to the public specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Undoubtedly, United States government should release more UFO information to the public. In order to support our position, we analyzed the works of three experts in the field. For instance, Bruce Maccabee, the doctor of Philosophy, is a collector of secret files from the government; Chris Rutkovsky is a recognized a stronomer who studies UFO; and Lawrence Fawcett used to work in the Government and had an access to its secrets. Position support The need for the United States government to release more UFO information to the public is obvious. The mass manipulation of citizens lasts for centuries; the information undergoes a number of filters before being introduced to the public. In pursuit of truth, people want to know what is happening indeed and what the results of the numerous researches carried during the last years are. Bruce Maccabee argues that the information about UFOs should not be secret. Firstly, the author investigates the issue of existence of the X-files, assuming that they may be just a part of a simulation operation. Next, he agrees on the fact that there are a lot of evidence about the UFO existence and its origins. For instance, Maccabee describes the documents he had a chance to see in the governmental institutions, with precise descriptions of the UFO and their contacts wit h the Earth. Finally, the writer reveals some data about UFO and presents the studies that were carried more that half a century ago. The writer says that the studies about UFO started at 1973, and all the facts were hidden from publics (Maccabee, 131). Similarly, the idea of the necessity of UFO data to be revealed is expressed by Rutkovski. However, the author studies the international environment rather than the American one. Rutkovski is rather skeptical about UFOs; his critical notes are sometimes striking; however, the author expresses an opinion that ignorant people are easier to manipulate. Therefore, he insists that the liberty of people would not be limited by the misleading information (Rutkovski, 82). Rutkovski compares the myths about UFO that exist in different cultures and by these means shows how ignorant people are in this sphere.Advertising Looking for research paper on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Lea rn More Another author, Lawrence Fawcett, is more radical in comparison with those mentioned above. He states that UFO can be dangerous for the security of the country, and as a result, of its citizens (Fawcett, 113). The author is deeply convinced that UFO tries to set a contact with Earth and people not only for communication, but because they want to exploit people and our planet. According to the author, this is the reason why UFO is sometimes kidnapping people and studying human bodies. Due to this fact, the publics have a right to know the truth about UFOs in order to be aware of possible risks. The opinion of Fawcett fully represents our idea. Discussion Despite the fact that all the three authors wish the UFO information to be revealed to the public, they all are aware of the possible consequences. There obviously have to be some reasons why the government keeps the data about unknown flying objects in secret; most possibly, these reasons are important. For instance, the p resentation of the UFO data to the public can cause panic. People would be afraid, feeling unsafe on their own planet. This can lead to serious problems, such as great depression, rebellions or even anarchy. Lawrence Fawcett expresses an idea that even though the information about UFOs is important, it can be as well dangerous (Fawcett, 81). The author also considers the fact that there are also people who are unwilling to know about UFOs; in this case, why should they get acquainted to this sort of information? Rutkovski also thinks that there can occur some unpredicted reactions in the publics after the information about the UFOs id revealed (Rutkovski, 152). The writer explains that the government had to keep the information in secret earlier; however, he does not approve the fact that today, when everybody is aware of the existence of UFO, the data is still hidden. In contrast, Maccabee thinks that the reveal of UFO data to general public can be solely positive. The author says that the government had been hiding the truth for too long; in addition, there are some operations that are claimed to be connected to UFO and therefore called secret, but in fact they just cover other dirty games of the American state (Maccabee, 74). Therefore, Maccabee thinks that people have a right to know the real situation. The author is deeply convinced that the American society is conscious enough to accept the information about the UFOs and decide what to do with it.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on United States government should release more UFO information to the public specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Conclusion The idea that the United States government should release more UFO information to the public was expressed by a number of specialists. On one hand, the fact that the people are kept ignorant about the current situation in the sphere of UFO is unfair, as everyone has a right to be wel l-informed. On the other hand, this sort of information is very special and can be destructive for the society and its consciousness. All in all, the knowledge of an individual depends not only on sources, but also on their own wish to know the truth. Works Cited Fawcett, L, Greenwood, B. UFO Cover-up: What the Government Won’t Say. Fireside, 1990. Lazerri, A. â€Å"British X-files papers revealed† The Sun, 17 November 2009, from: https://www.thesun.co.uk/ Maccabee, B, Maupin, M. UFO-FBI Connection. Llewellyn Worldwide, LTD, 2000. Rutkovski, C, Dittman, G. The Canadian UFO Report: The Best Cases Revealed California: Dundurn Group, 2006. This research paper on United States government should release more UFO information to the public was written and submitted by user Nickolas Watts to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

The Difference between Agricultural Societies and Hunter

The Difference between Agricultural Societies and Hunter Discussing the Distinctions between social groups In the course of time, people have been searching for techniques and approaches to adjust to geographical, social, and cultural environment in the past and in the modern contexts. Gradual development of social and culturally different groups and nations, however, is not predetermined by a biological evolution, or by unequal conditions for the civilization development.Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on The Difference between Agricultural Societies and Hunter-Gathers Societies in the Past specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In this respect, Brody distinguishes between two social groups – hunters-gatherers and farmers – that were formed irrespectively of each other due to the certain historical and social conditions (14). Hence, the author states that farmers are more mobile, restless, nomadic, and expansive in comparison with hunter-gathers who prefer to s tay on a more secure, home territory (Brody 114). The difference between agricultural societies and hunter-gathers societies also lies in temporal characteristics and the level of technological penetrations (Gonzalez 3). In particular, farmers are more developed in technological terms because they should work out strategies for increasing productivity and advancing farming practices. However, Gonzalez emphasizes that original farmers who lived on the territory of the North American were more inclined to use ecology-friendly techniques to sustain traditional modes of farming and agriculture (27). In discussing the differences between farmers and hunter-gatherers, Evans-Pritchard outlines two distinguishing criteria that identify the Nuer tribes: political system and ecology (47). In particular, hunter-gathers do not have particular organizational structure and subordination; instead, their political order is more close to anarchy. In ecological terms, the hunters and farmer can be cl assified in accordance with spatial discontinuity. In contrast, Pollan speaks about farmers and foragers through their attitude to plant and animals (123). In particular, farmers considered corn not only as the food, but as the good that can be sold. Therefore, there were mode focused on advancing their technologies and increasing yield. In their turn, foragers were less developed in these terms because they correlated food with culture and spirituality.Advertising Looking for term paper on anthropology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More While examining the elements of Nuer culture as compared with contemporary communities originating from the immigration, Holtzman emphasizes that the Nuer life is closely connected with the waves of immigrations to the United States and explains that hunter-gatherers are more attached to traditions, kin relations, and culture (42). They had little interest in technologies and other tec hniques because their values were not based on materialistic objects, but on the spiritual development. Social and Historical Forces That Are Responsible For These Modes of Life in the Recent Past Considering social factors affecting the formation of the farmers and hunter-gatherers, mostly all humans were hunter-gatherers over the years. However, this mode of life gradually altered due to the rise of agriculture that developed in societies. Paradoxically, despite of their chaotic structures, these groups are often united on the basis of kinship and tribe membership. Brody also emphasizes that hunter-gatherer tribes have a distinct division of labor on a gender basic (2). In this regard the nomadic groups of the past are closely associated with the migration process in the contemporary societies. Hence, the waves of immigrations predetermined by political and social processes made people change their modes of lives and choose a hunter-gatherer style of living (Pollan 24). The social and economical instability, therefore, played a decisive role in forming the groups (Gonzalez 103). The analysis of historic precondition distinctly reveals the evolution of farmers and hunters where the conventional strategies applied to agriculture have been gradually replaced by modern industrial farming (Gonzalez 172). Social and Historical Forces As Presented in the Current Situation Identifying the group: historical and social influences The migration processes in the twentieth century caused significant shifts in the lives of the American people and immigrations. Blend of cultures and traditions, therefore, have made both groups change heir lives and outlooks on the current situation. I would like to present the migration process in the United States and how the waves of migration influence political environment and modes of life of different groups, which are the brightest examples of modern conjunctures. It is possible to assume that migration paths are closely connected w ith group’s motivations and goals to explore other lands and possibilities. Therefore, those people who migrate to the United State were less concerned with economic and social conditions, but were guided by the possibility to innovate.Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on The Difference between Agricultural Societies and Hunter-Gathers Societies in the Past specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Providing connection between the past and the present. The migrating groups debunk the myth about historical and social predetermination of the group affiliation either to farming or to foraging communities. Hence, the facts that the migrating groups derive from the agricultural societies does not guarantee that they could change their farming orientation. Hence, the migration of the African tribes to the United States pushed them to the marginal areas proves that these groups with a deep historic of hunting and gathering can be simply converted in an agricultural society. Such process can also be called as the second Neolithic revolution, the transition from foragers to farmers. Such a conversion is predetermined by necessity to adjust to the new mode of living. From migrated groups from Africa, agriculture and farming was the only means for survival; it also provided a favorable ground for adjusting to alien culture and tradition and for meeting the needs of a new social and political environment. Brody, Hugh. The Other Side of Eden: Hunters, Farmers, and the Shaping of the World. New York: North Point Press, 2001. Print. Evans-Pitchard, E. E.. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Instituions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1940. Print. Gonzalez, Roberto Jesus. Zapotec Science: Farming and Food in the Northern Sierra of Oaxaca. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2001. Print. Holtzman, Jom. Nuer Journeys, Nuer Lives. Needham Heights: Allyn Bacon, 2000. Print.Advertising Looking for term paper on anthropology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Pollan, Michael. The Omnovore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. New York: Penguin Press, 2006. Print.

To what extent did Allied strategic bombing have significant strategic Essay

To what extent did Allied strategic bombing have significant strategic effects on the successful outcome of the war (WWII) Did this Allied employment of air p - Essay Example nge of strategy in the later stages of the war was also responsible for the attainment of the political objectives of the war - to cripple Germany and destroy her continued occupation of territories in Europe, including her attacks on Britain. What Britain was unable to achieve on the political front in arresting German occupation of Europe, was however achieved through the change in the strategic bombing policy of the allied forces. Strategic bombing by allied air power was the decisive factor that led to victory for the allies in World War II. The change in the British war policies and the bombing effort was the direct effort of political pressures. One of these was the growing tide of British public opinion in favor of bombing of German cities, in the aftermath of 1940, when France fell to Germany. Another significant reason for the shift in policy to direct bombing of German cities was the pressure exerted by Stalin on the British, to open up a second front to allow for some relief on the German-Soviet frontlines. However, Clausewitz’s abstract theory of war is based upon the premise that war commanders must decide at the outset â€Å"the kind of war on which they are embarking†2 and politics and war cannot be mingled with each other; policy should not be the guiding force that influences military operations. If one looks at the political objectives of strategic bombing as the twin destruction of a country’s will to fight as well as its ability to produce materiel, the Allied missions between 1942 a nd 1944 were the hammer blows on German industry and morale. Had the Allies not developed their long-range fighters, or had they not decided to move their targets to large cities instead of small, industrial targets, the outcome might have been much different, even with the addition of the Eastern Front. This entailed a change in war policy that was directly the result of political pressures, disproving the notion that politics and war cannot be mingled with